Science Fiction as Social Science Discourse
Of particular importance to the genetic
debate should be those science fiction stories that seek to
explore mans efforts to conquer nature, from Victor Frankenstein
who searches for the secret spark of life to Michael Crichton's
Dr. Wu who attempts to tame it. Much of the popular affection
and serious esteem science fiction has come to enjoy since the
1818 advent of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
derives from its entertaining and colorful, though often gritty
and blunt, forum for ethical debate and civic activism. Over
the past two centuries, science fiction has foreseen the rise
of lasers, lunar landings, nuclear disasters and the increased
influx of artificial technology into the health science fields.
Before embarking on any survey of science
fiction, it will be helpful first to establish an operationalized
definition of science fiction. For the purpose of this study,
science fiction is a literary mode in which the "techniques
of extrapolation and speculation are utilized in a narrative
form, to construct near-future, far-future or fantastic worlds
in which science, technology and society intersect" (Thacker,
2000).
There are certain critical components that
characterize science fiction. The first is the distinction between
the methodologies of extrapolation and speculation. Generally,
extrapolation is defined as an imaginative extension of a present
condition, usually into a future world that is "just around
the corner." By contrast, speculation involves a certain
imaginative leap, in which a world (either in the distant future
or altogether unrelated) markedly different from the present
is constructed. As can be imagined, most science fiction involves
some combination of these, culminating in worlds that are at
once strange and very familiar.
It is this familiarity that allows the reader
to relate to the new environment, but the foreignness that allows
the social commentary to become isolated for closer inspection.
More and more genre science fiction is coming to terms not just
with technical concerns, but also with social, cultural and
political concerns. As such, the use of extrapolation or speculation
and the construction of ontological worlds move science fiction
into a realm that involves thinking about the complex dynamics
between technology and globalization, science and gender, race
and colonialism, and related concerns (such as genetic politics).
Such a complexification of science fiction
has been highlighted by critics such as Fredric Jameson as a
critical function of its evolution. Jameson articulates two
critical functions that science fiction can have (Jameson,
1987). The first is characterized by the development of
"future histories" or ways in which science fiction
places itself in relation to history. Discussing science fiction
as the dialectical counterpart to the genre of the historical
novel, Jameson suggests that one of the primary roles of science
fiction is not to "keep the future alive" but to demonstrate
the ways in which visions of the future are first and foremost
a means of understanding a particular historical present.
A second role Jameson ascribes to science
fiction is a more symptomatic one. Referencing the work of the
Frankfurt School on the "utopian imagination," science
fiction can form a kind of cultural indicator of a culture's
ability or inability to imagine possible futures. For Jameson,
writing during the high point of postmodernism, science fiction
was an indicator of a pervasive loss of historicity and the
atrophying of the will to critically imagine utopias. Thus,
not only is each vision of the future conditioned by a historical
moment in which it is imagined, but, increasingly, science fiction's
main concern is with the contingency involved in producing the
future, as well as interrogating the constraints and limitations
that enable the capacity to imagine the future at all.
Introduction
The Human Genome
Project
Some Deeper
Questions
Science
Fiction as Social Science Discourse
Proposal
and Preliminary Reading List
Annotated
Bibliography: Research Readings
Annotated
Bibliography: Preliminary Reading List
©2000 Richard
Stevens, All Rights Reserved.
Check out Rick's Other Work.
|